California's Electricity Rates Should Be Unbundled — Op-Ed - CleanTechnica

2022-09-17 10:42:31 By : Ms. Alina Zhang

Hi, what are you looking for?

Decoupling From China On Clean Tech Comes With Far More Risks Than Rewards

When Is Geothermal As Bad As Coal?

Pan African Resources’ 9.9 MW Solar Plant In South Africa Saves $170K Per Month On The Gold Mine’s Electric Bill

Giant Steps & Baby Steps For Fuel Cell Trucks In The US

Virtual Power Plant Model To Expand In Utah & Idaho (With Video)

When Is Geothermal As Bad As Coal?

Biden–⁠Harris Admin — New Actions to Expand U.S. Offshore Wind Energy

New Australia Lithium Mine For Ford, LG, & Tesla Lithium To Be Powered By Giant Off-Grid Solar, Wind, & Battery Project

President William Ruto Sworn In, Reaffirms Kenya’s Commitment To Transition To 100% Clean Energy By 2030

Build Back Better Lives Again, Now With Green Hydrogen

When Is Geothermal As Bad As Coal?

President William Ruto Sworn In, Reaffirms Kenya’s Commitment To Transition To 100% Clean Energy By 2030

New Lithium StoryMap & the Future of Electrification

Enhanced Geothermal Technology Cracks The 24/7 Energy Code

Decarbonizing Data Centers — It’s Fun!

$71,315 – Lithium Prices Reach All-time High

When Is Geothermal As Bad As Coal?

Sustainable Battery Materials? Yeah, Right — Or, Right On!

Goldman Sachs Ignites Energy Storage Gold Rush

Insurance Company Fakes Battery Fire On Tesla Model S To Highlight That EVs Can Catch Fire (Video)

NY Governor Hochul Announces Winner of 2022 New York–Israel Smart Energy Innovation Challenge

Biden–Harris Admin Launches $10.5 Billion Investment to Strengthen America’s Electric Grid

Electric Vehicles Don’t Break The Grid, And They Can Help Boost It

Stryten Energy Applauds Investments in Energy Security & U.S. Manufacturers With Passage Of Inflation Reduction Act

First V2G (Vehicle to Grid) System on Launches NYC Grid

Switching The World To Renewable Energy Will Cost $62 Trillion, But The Payback Would Take Just 6 Years

Understanding The High Efficiency Electric Home Rebate Act (HEEHRA)

Questions About IRA Benefits? Rewiring America Has The Answers

10 Big Cleantech Benefits in Inflation Reduction Act

A Cheap Clean RV Option Emerges

The Evolution Of The Israeli EV Market Gives Us An Example Of What’s To Come In Other Markets

$71,315 – Lithium Prices Reach All-time High

IKEA 3-Hour Delivery Service Using Electric Vans

The First Batch of BYD ATTO 3s Are Already In Israel & Ready For Delivery!

Tesla Full Self Driving Beta: Lost & Found! We Lost It After 206 Days, Got It Back Again After 79 Days

Goodbye, LEAF. Hello, Bolt EUV

Thoughts On Class Action Lawsuit Against Tesla Regarding Autopilot & Full Self-Driving Capability (“FSD”) — From A Buyer

Hyundai IONIQ 5 vs. Volvo C40 Recharge

Can Someone Explain To Me Why Tesla FSD Can’t Choose The Correct Lane?

Germany’s Plugin EVs Resume Growth, Tesla Model Y Leads

UK Auto Market Struggling But Full Electrics Still Growing

France’s Plugin EVs Back To Modest Growth, Renault Megane Favourite

Norway’s Plugin EVs Still Falling, For Reasons

Sweden Plugin EV Share At 46.1% In August

Tesla Full Self Driving Beta: Lost & Found! We Lost It After 206 Days, Got It Back Again After 79 Days

Goodbye, LEAF. Hello, Bolt EUV

Thoughts On Class Action Lawsuit Against Tesla Regarding Autopilot & Full Self-Driving Capability (“FSD”) — From A Buyer

Hyundai IONIQ 5 vs. Volvo C40 Recharge

Can Someone Explain To Me Why Tesla FSD Can’t Choose The Correct Lane?

Exploring XPeng’s Self-Driving Tech Live — 1 Hour+, No Interventions!

2022 Nissan Leaf S Plus — CleanTechnica Review (VIDEO) 

Ford F-150 Lightning — CleanTechnica Review

Tesla Q4 Shareholder Conference Call — Watch & Listen Here

Volkswagen Group — In-Depth Conference Call Highlights Company’s Focus On Transition

The discussion about California’s grid, rooftop solar energy, and net metering goes on. Following up on the comments under this article and then this article as well as years of debate, research reports, lobbying, solar industry pushback, and a net metering update that seems to be in complete limbo, below is a comment from CleanTechnica reader “rawlsio” summarizing some key changes to the electricity rate system and subsidies in California that could solve a series of problems.

One of the core improvements that could be made to California’s electricity rates would be to “unbundle” them. Right now, the three biggest utilities charge a very high per kWh rate (shockingly high compared to the national average rate of 12 cents/kWh).

These rates are meant to recover the full cost of operating the utility, which includes not only the cost of generating or purchasing power/energy, but the fixed costs of operating the overall grid and delivery system. This has the effect of making electricity very expensive, which promotes conservation of electricity, but also inhibits electrification. It increases the costs of operating an EV, operating a heat pump instead of a gas furnace, induction stoves, etc. — all of which slows adoption of this tech in the transport and buildings sectors, both of which are “dirtier” than the current California electric grid.

A better way to decarbonize would be to drop electricity down to its true marginal cost + social cost of carbon (estimated to be something like an average of 9 cents per kWh, but obviously higher at peak demand), then collect the bulk of utility revenues from fixed monthly grid connection fees. These could be based on connection size, or even income level to promote equity, but they would be decoupled from the per-kWh charges. This would definitely promote electricity consumption, but it would do it by shifting energy consumption away from our most polluting sources — gasoline and diesel for cars and trucks and natural gas for space heating and water heating.

What would this do to rooftop solar? Well, since most of the compensation for rooftop solar under NEM 3.0 comes from avoiding (netting out) the current high per kWh electricity charges, it would dramatically cut total compensation. The grid connection fee would also shift back the costs of grid maintenance that these customers are mostly able to avoid under NEM 2.0.

As I said above (in a different thread), I don’t think it would be fair to dump this on current solar customers (who made investment calculations under existing rules) without offering some kind of “glide-path” payments that still allow them to get a decent return on their investments.

It will also force the “pitch” for rooftop solar to conform to the true economics of avoiding grid-delivered electricity, rather than the inflated economics of NEM payments and fixed cost avoidance. Those economics will still be “good enough” for plenty of future customers, especially those in places that are harder to serve and prone to resiliency problems. In fact, California already offers high rebates on home batteries for people who live in fire-prone areas subject to emergency power cutoffs ($150–$1,000/kWh of storage depending on location and income level).

In the end, having to make the pitch for rooftop solar based on better economic analysis (and I would absolutely include the “locational” value of rooftop solar in places where it really does help relieve grid congestion economically) is going to force installers and localities to reduce the costs of rooftop solar, as they have managed to do in other jurisdictions.

The goal is not (should not be) to eliminate rooftop solar — I don’t want prime solar generating real estate to go to waste either. The goal should be to maximize renewable energy generation with the dollars available. To the extent we need to subsidize renewable energy, it should be done with dollars that are collected (or taxes that are avoided) under a progressive income tax at the federal or state level, not shifted to other ratepayers, and certainly not shifted to lower income ratepayers. The current utility billing methodology in California is not structured to promote either of those goals.

Featured image by Kyle Field | CleanTechnica

Zach is tryin' to help society help itself one word at a time. He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director, chief editor, and CEO. Zach is recognized globally as an electric vehicle, solar energy, and energy storage expert. He has presented about cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, Canada, and Curaçao. Zach has long-term investments in Tesla [TSLA], NIO [NIO], Xpeng [XPEV], Ford [F], ChargePoint [CHPT], Amazon [AMZN], Piedmont Lithium [PLL], Lithium Americas [LAC], Albemarle Corporation [ALB], Nouveau Monde Graphite [NMGRF], Talon Metals [TLOFF], Arclight Clean Transition Corp [ACTC], and Starbucks [SBUX]. But he does not offer (explicitly or implicitly) investment advice of any sort.

#1 most loved electric vehicle, solar energy, and battery news & analysis site in the world.   Support our work today!

Advertise with CleanTechnica to get your company in front of millions of monthly readers.

If you know me much, you probably know that the State of California and I don’t always see eye to eye on things. But,...

A new law in California greatly expands the policy incentives for community solar which will reward projects that include battery storage.

We have some of the most informed readers in the world, but that doesn’t mean they agree on everything. In fact, sometimes they have...

The heatwave that’s been hitting California and other states in the West has been a beast of a problem. It’s crippling grids, which even...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.